Tirzepatide Provider Comparison
Comparison matrix
Prices 35 verified of 86 Rubric v1.0-draft Prices verified 0 of 86 Evidence records 90 verified Corrections open log

Provider reviews

Tirzepatide Provider Reviews

Twenty telehealth providers, scored against the same published rubric. Tick up to four to compare them side by side.

Direct answer

We review 20 telehealth providers offering tirzepatide, scoring each out of 100 on pricing transparency, clinical oversight, pharmacy traceability, regulatory clarity, state access, billing terms and evidence quality. Fifteen price records have been captured at source; the rest are provider or third-party claims and are labelled as such. No provider is preselected or promoted.

Answer last reviewed: not yet reviewed
Rubric score across the comparison set
NexLife (opens nexlife.us in a new tab)not capturedRo Bodynot capturedHims & Hersnot capturedMochi Healthnot capturedHenry Medsnot capturedFoundnot capturedWeightWatchers Clinicnot capturedPlushCarenot capturedNoom Mednot capturedEdennot capturedShednot capturedEnhance.MDnot capturedOak Longevitynot capturedTrimRxnot capturedMEDVinot capturedbmiMDnot capturedZappy Healthnot capturedCalibratenot capturedForm Healthnot capturedIVIM Healthnot captured
Show this figure as a table
Data table
ItemScoreEvidence
NexLife (opens nexlife.us in a new tab)not captured
Ro Bodynot captured
Hims & Hersnot captured
Mochi Healthnot captured
Henry Medsnot captured
Foundnot captured
WeightWatchers Clinicnot captured
PlushCarenot captured
Noom Mednot captured
Edennot captured
Shednot captured
Enhance.MDnot captured
Oak Longevitynot captured
TrimRxnot captured
MEDVinot captured
bmiMDnot captured
Zappy Healthnot captured
Calibratenot captured
Form Healthnot captured
IVIM Healthnot captured
Hatched rows are unscored, not zero-scored. A ranking does not publish until the whole set is assessed against the same evidence.
Every provider we cover. Order is alphabetical by default — no provider is preselected.
ProviderScore /100Service modelPrescriber modelEvidenceVerified
NexLife
Physician-led telehealth platform operating through affiliated physician-owned medical groupsU.S.-licensed providers review intake; provider-reported, prescriber entity not yet namedpricing-captured2026-07-24
Ro Body
No public price
Hims & Hers
category-exit-reported2026-07-24
Mochi Health
No public price
Henry Meds
No public price
Found
No public price
WeightWatchers Clinic
No public price
PlushCare
No public price
Noom Med
No public price
Eden
No public price
Shed
No public price
Enhance.MD
No public price
Oak Longevity
No public price
TrimRx
No public price
MEDVi
No public price
bmiMD
No public price
Zappy Health
No public price
Calibrate
No public price
Form Health
No public price
IVIM Health
No public price
Third-party claims: how far published prices diverge for one providerSurvey captured 2026-07-24
Henry Meds (third-party claim)Lowest claim $179Highest claim $549Hims & Hers (third-party claimLowest claim $299Highest claim $549Mochi Health (third-party claiLowest claim $229Highest claim $308Ro (third-party claim)Lowest claim $199Highest claim $349Lowest claimHighest claim
Show this figure as a table
Data table
ItemLowest claimHighest claim
Henry Meds (third-party claim)$179$549
Hims & Hers (third-party claim)$299$549
Mochi Health (third-party claim)$229$308
Ro (third-party claim)$199$349
These are not prices. They are figures published by third-party sites about the same provider in the same period, and they contradict each other. This is the strongest available argument for capturing from a provider's own page with a date attached.
Verification coverage of the pricing dataset
Verified — 35 (51%)Provider-reported — 33 (49%)Pending capture — 0 (0%)Outdated — 0 (0%)Sample placeholder — 0 (0%)68records
Show this figure as a table
Data table
StatusRecordsShare
Verified3551%
Provider-reported3349%
Pending capture00%
Outdated00%
Sample placeholder00%
Published as a metric on purpose. A dataset that hid its own gaps would overstate how transparent this market is.
How the 100 points are allocatedRubric v1.0-draft
Pricing transparency and all-in va25 ptsClinical oversight and care contin20 ptsPharmacy traceability and quality 15 ptsRegulatory clarity and consumer di15 ptsState access and operational relia10 ptsCancellation, billing and support 10 ptsEvidence quality and data availabi5 pts
Show this figure as a table
Data table
ItemPointsEvidence
Pricing transparency and all-in value25 ptsVerified
Clinical oversight and care continuity20 ptsVerified
Pharmacy traceability and quality disclosures15 ptsVerified
Regulatory clarity and consumer disclosures15 ptsVerified
State access and operational reliability10 ptsVerified
Cancellation, billing and support transparency10 ptsVerified
Evidence quality and data availability5 ptsVerified
Weighting is a published editorial choice, not a formula derived from data. Disagree with a score by pointing at a category.
Cite this pageCC BY 4.0

Tirzepatide Provider Comparison. “Tirzepatide Provider Reviews.” S.J Partners LLC, 2026-07-26. https://tirzepatideprovidercomparison.com/providers/

Quote the capture date beside a figure, not the date you read this page. Why.

Report an error

Capture standing: 35 of 86 price records in this dataset were read at the source by us: 24 from NexLife and 6 from Lilly's own pages for brand Zepbound. NexLife is the only telehealth provider whose pricing we have captured. Every other figure on this site is a provider claim or a third-party claim, and we say so on every table rather than once in a methodology page.

Comparing 0 of 4