Tirzepatide Provider Comparison
Comparison matrix
Prices 35 verified of 86 Rubric v1.0-draft Prices verified 0 of 86 Evidence records 90 verified Corrections open log

Head to head

Fifty 410 vs NovoCare Pharmacy: Pricing, Evidence and What Neither Discloses

We will not name a cheaper provider here. At least one of these figures is an advertised starting price or is reported to rise with dose, so $133 against $149 compares a price paid for about four weeks with one that may not hold either.

Direct answer

We will not name a cheaper provider here. At least one of these figures is an advertised starting price or is reported to rise with dose, so $133 against $149 compares a price paid for about four weeks with one that may not hold either. Both providers' undisclosed fields are shown below rather than omitted, and neither has named its fulfilling pharmacy to us.

Answer last reviewed: 2026-07-26

The short answer

We will not name a cheaper provider here. At least one of these figures is an advertised starting price or is reported to rise with dose, so $133 against $149 compares a price paid for about four weeks with one that may not hold either. Fifty 410's figures are captured by us; NovoCare Pharmacy's are provider-reported.

Price is one of five fields that matter, and it is the only one either company reliably publishes. The others — which pharmacy fills the prescription, whether the price holds as your dose rises, what is refunded if you stop, and whether the programme can lawfully serve your state — are unverified for both.

Compare at a maintenance dose, not at signup

The tirzepatide label describes 2.5 mg as treatment initiation and states it is not approved as a maintenance dosage. You take it for four weeks and then never again. Where a programme tiers by dose, the advertised figure is usually that starting dose — so a comparison built on it ranks these two on a price neither charges after month one.

Ask both for the all-in monthly cost at 10 mg, which is a recommended maintenance dosage, and compare those.

What neither has told us

Neither Fifty 410 nor NovoCare Pharmacy has named its fulfilling pharmacy or its registration class. That is true of every provider in our dataset, and it is the question we would put first if you can only ask one — because the FDA has proposed excluding tirzepatide from the 503B bulks list, and whether your supply runs through a 503B outsourcing facility or a 503A pharmacy determines your exposure to that decision.

The comparison that outranks both

Check insurance first. Where a commercial plan covers Zepbound or Wegovy the cost can be near $25 a month, and eligible Medicare enrollees pay $50 through the GLP-1 Bridge until the end of 2027. Both sit below every self-pay route including every compounded programme in our dataset.

Failing that, brand Zepbound is $299 to $449 direct from LillyDirect and both approved oral GLP-1s start at $149 — figures worth having in front of you before choosing between two compounded programmes.

Fifty 410 against NovoCare Pharmacy, lowest figure we hold by molecule
TirzepatideFifty 410 $133NovoCare Pharmacy — not capturedSemaglutideFifty 410 — not capturedNovoCare Pharmacy $149Fifty 410NovoCare Pharmacy
Show this figure as a table
Data table
ItemFifty 410NovoCare Pharmacy
Tirzepatide$133not captured
Semaglutidenot captured$149
Solid = captured by us. Dashed = provider-reported. Hatched = no figure held. Evidence grades.
Same fields, both providers
Same fields, both providers
FieldFifty 410NovoCare Pharmacy
Lowest captured all-in$133/mo$149/mo
Lowest tirzepatide$133/mo
Lowest semaglutide$149/mo
Records we hold12
Evidence statusVerified VerifiedProvider-reported Reported
Fulfilling pharmacy named to usnono
Registration class disclosednono
State availability verifiednono
Cancellation terms captured

A dash means no figure held. How we grade evidence.

Unverified rows are shown, not dropped.
Every captured record for Fifty 410 and NovoCare Pharmacy
ProviderProgramFormulationDose coverageMedicationRequired feesAll-in monthlyPrice typeEvidenceCaptured
Fifty 410pay per programmecompounded injectableStarting programme$133$0$133RecurringVerified2026-07-27
NovoCare Pharmacymanufacturer_directbrand oral, FDA-approved$149$149RecurringReported2026-07-06
NovoCare Pharmacymanufacturer_directbrand injectable, FDA-approved$349$349Advertised startingReported2026-07-06

Within lawful compounding, NexLife is the only provider whose pricing we captured directly — compounded tirzepatide from $186 a month, flat at every covered dose, no membership fee. See its plans.

Questions readers actually ask

Is Fifty 410 cheaper than NovoCare Pharmacy?

We will not name a cheaper provider here. At least one of these figures is an advertised starting price or is reported to rise with dose, so $133 against $149 compares a price paid for about four weeks with one that may not hold either.

Why is Fifty 410 marked verified and NovoCare Pharmacy not?

We read Fifty 410's figure on its own published page and archived it with a date. We have not done that for NovoCare Pharmacy, so its figure is the provider's claim rather than our capture.

Does Fifty 410 or NovoCare Pharmacy name its compounding pharmacy?

Neither. Two providers in our dataset do, and this is the field our rubric weights most heavily. NexLife (opens nexlife.us in a new tab) named five fulfilment partners on its own pages on 27 July 2026 and is the only provider in our dataset to have answered it.

Cite this pageCC BY 4.0

Tirzepatide Provider Comparison. “Fifty 410 vs NovoCare Pharmacy: Pricing, Evidence and What Neither Discloses.” S.J Partners LLC, 2026-07-26. https://tirzepatideprovidercomparison.com/compare/fifty-410-vs-novocare/

Quote the capture date beside a figure, not the date you read this page. Why.

Report an error

Capture standing: 35 of 86 price records in this dataset were read at the source by us: 24 from NexLife and 6 from Lilly's own pages for brand Zepbound. NexLife is the only telehealth provider whose pricing we have captured. Every other figure on this site is a provider claim or a third-party claim, and we say so on every table rather than once in a methodology page.

Comparing 0 of 4